LA INVESTIGACIÓN PSICOLÓGICA DEL DESARROLLO DE LA JUSTICIA:¿RACIONALIDAD INMANENTE O POLIFASIA COGNITIVA?

Authors

  • Alicia Barreiro UBA
  • José Antonio Castorina UBA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14572/nuances.v23i24.1890

Keywords:

justice, cognitive development, cognitive polyphasia, social representations

Abstract

Different perspectives about justice have been competing in ethical philosophy from Plato and Aristotle to contemporary debates. However, cognitive developmental psychology has traditionally based its empirical research in the Kantian conception of distributive justice. This paper analyzes the consequences of such assumption for psychological research, contrasting it with cognitive polyphasia thesis and its empirical results. Thus the decontextualized moral situations in which genetic psychology is based on are compared with moral problems that individuals experience in their everyday life. Finally, the uniqueness and universality of an immanent development of rational thought are rejected and is pointed out the need to reconsider the individual construction processes of moral judgments in the context of social representations that enable and constrain to them.

http://dx.doi.org/10.14572/nuances.v23i24.1890

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alicia Barreiro, UBA

Doctora en Ciencias de la Educación. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas e Universidad de Buenos Aires.

José Antonio Castorina, UBA

Doctor en Educación. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas e Universidad de Buenos Aires.

Published

2012-12-26

How to Cite

BARREIRO, A.; CASTORINA, J. A. LA INVESTIGACIÓN PSICOLÓGICA DEL DESARROLLO DE LA JUSTICIA:¿RACIONALIDAD INMANENTE O POLIFASIA COGNITIVA?. Nuances: estudos sobre Educação, Presidente Prudente, v. 23, n. 24, p. 35–54, 2012. DOI: 10.14572/nuances.v23i24.1890. Disponível em: https://revista.fct.unesp.br/index.php/Nuances/article/view/1890. Acesso em: 22 jul. 2024.

Issue

Section

Dossiê